Current:Home > NewsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Aspire Financial Strategies
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 09:01:24
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (7871)
Related
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Kevin Durant fires back at Stephen A. Smith over ESPN's personality's criticism
- Endangered Bats Have Slowed, But Not Stopped, a Waterfront Mega-Development in Charleston. Could Flood Risk?
- Hindered Wildfire Responses, Costlier Agriculture Likely If Trump Dismantles NOAA, Experts Warn
- Gen. Mark Milley's security detail and security clearance revoked, Pentagon says
- AP Top 25: Oregon a unanimous No. 1 ahead of 1st CFP rankings, followed by Georgia, Ohio State
- Developer of Former Philadelphia Refinery Site Finalizes Pact With Community Activists
- Instagram video blurry? Company heads admits quality is degraded if views are low
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- Hurricane-Related Deaths Keep Happening Long After a Storm Ends
Ranking
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Developer of Former Philadelphia Refinery Site Finalizes Pact With Community Activists
- Health Risks Due to Climate Change Are Rising Dangerously, Lancet Report Concludes
- Doctors left her in the dark about what to expect. Online, other women stepped in.
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Talking About the Election With Renewable Energy Nonprofit Leaders: “I Feel Very Nervous”
- Alabama Mine Expansion Could Test Biden Policy on Private Extraction of Publicly Owned Coal
- Holding Out Hope On the Drying Rio Grande
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
NYC declares a drought watch and asks residents to conserve water
Federal judge lets Iowa keep challenging voter rolls although naturalized citizens may be affected
On Meeker Avenue in Brooklyn, How Environmental Activism Plays Out in the Neighborhood
Sam Taylor
Opponents use parental rights and anti-trans messages to fight abortion ballot measures
Dawson's Creek's James Van Der Beek Shares Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis
Getting Out the Native Vote Counters a Long History of Keeping Tribal Members from the Ballot Box